Thought Provoker - Windows 7 – The Desktop Virtualization Catalyst?
|
|
Wednesday, September 09, 2009 by Jon Wallace in Desktop Virtualization in General | 2189 views | 6 comments
What I have to say here is not new and something that many other people are thinking but I just wanted to put out a verbal view and get people’s thoughts and feedback. I’m open for a healthy discussion on this and also to change my mind however here is my thought.
My understanding is that on average, organizations conduct a desktop refresh every 5 years and during this time replace hardware, software and other elements of desktop computing. Desktop Virtualization brings huge benefits such as the lack of need to further refresh hardware or the supportability of multiple machines.
The problem however today is that the TCO argument for desktop virtualization is not proven and not effective enough for organizations to convert en mass; it’s not that I don’t think it will be, it’s just that it’s not right now. Now I know that many organizations, especially the major desktop virtualization vendors will disagree with this point however you just have to walk around a trade show and see all of the products offering to “reduce the cost of VDI” to know this is the case and up to now, this fact has put many organizations off looking at VDI seriously.
Now, Windows 7 potentially changes all of this…
Most organizations skipped Windows Vista due to either real or perceived problems (I actually didn’t have a problem with Vista) and therefore possibly extended their desktop refresh cycles too. Windows XP is the prevalent desktop OS, however, will at some point be out of support and can’t support some of the new features and applications being developed today. Couple this with the fact that Microsoft will but an enormous amount of effort behind Windows 7 to ensure its success I can personally see organizations adopting the new operating system with enhanced vigor.
OK, so based on this and the fact that I assume organizations extended their desktop refresh cycles, Windows 7 will also bring a new round of equipment and therefore a new round of cost. Now while desktop virtualization was a hard cost to accept when an organization has perfectly good working machines, it’s not so bad when it’s part of a desktop refresh. Sure the layout costs of implementing VDI over a few thousand machines may be more but when you consider that there won’t be another need to buy any further hardware, ever, the TCO going forward is excellent and unmatched.
Windows 7 is released in October albeit many organizations having it now and come the new year I would imagine that organizations will be adopting the new operating system en mass. If there was ever a time for vendors, service delivery organizations and engineers to be preaching the virtualization word, it’s now. If the largest customers adopt a physical refresh, there is an uphill battle to convert them to virtual desktops however if the solutions from Citrix, VMWare and Microsoft are evangelized and adopted now then the organization will never look back…
Don’t miss this wave!
In my opinion there is a limited Windows to gain huge traction very quickly with desktop virtualization and that is the next 6 - 12 months. Desktop virtualization is the future and nothing is going to change that (even if there are certain IT techs stuck in their ways objecting to change) and the organizations who get on this now will experience the most success with the technology.
It’s vital to understand that Windows 7 will be huge in the industry and simply because Microsoft will do everything in its power to make it so. Once this is understood, it is imperative that organizations use Windows 7 as a catalyst to adopting desktop virtualization.
Tomorrow I will talk about the eco system such as personalization, security, licensing and access that will be essential to desktop virtualization but for now I wanted to at least get my initial thoughts out there.
If you haven’t already, take a look at the whitepapers and documentation from the major virtualization vendors and ping me a comment with your views.
Thanks!
Comments (6):
|
|
Guest on Wednesday, September 09, 2009
|
|
|
VDI is not as mature as you make it out to be
|
|
|
Jon Wallace on Wednesday, September 09, 2009
|
|
|
I don't know that I agree with you and I think the technology works and is ready for adoption. Sure, all of the bells and whilstles are not there yet but you need to understand that this is early days for a new technology.
I've worked a lot with the Citrix offering since the first beta's of it and i'm exceptionally impressed at the progress they made. I can only assume the same from VMWare too.
People will always have objections to any technology however saying there are problems with the technology is no reason to not adopt it - if this is the case we wouldn't have had Terminal Services and look how good that is today.
I think I understand your view but there is enough weight behind this technology to make it work and overcome technical hurdles.
|
|
|
Eric S. Perkins on Thursday, September 10, 2009
|
|
|
I just can not wrap my mind around VDI. I get the niche plays .edu and labs, dev shops I get all that.
For the masses it does not make sense. It makes sense to move applications to a web based format on a public or private cloud scenario and host legacy apps in a Citrix XenApp or Terminal Services environment. This to me makes sense.
I will place a real money wager that VDI in general fails and enterprise computing goes in a different direction. Jon e-mail me offline if you want to take the bet ;-)
I'm not saying that Citrix, Microsoft and VMware won't sell a ton of it just from the buzz surrounding it. And the nice thing for companies like AppSense is the solution needs something to manage the users and the environments.
VDI = Industry Fodder - Also one more note on this I have challenged CIO's, CTO's and Directors of IT who have made major VDI purchasing decisions to a healthy debate and true ROI numbers and only one said he would do it and backed out. the numbers are not right yet.
|
|
|
Jon Wallace on Thursday, September 10, 2009
|
|
|
Hmmm interesting view but i'm not sure and here is the reason...
Desktop virtualization is the natural evolution of the desktop and you even touched on that (i think) in your post. Physical hardware has a limited life at this point, at least in the workplace and the concept of the employee buying their own access device (aka a laptop) is closer than I think we believe it is.
I do believe the technology is there, Citrix has certainly proven that and have a wonderful product, and I also believe that organizations are willing to adopt the technology however what concerns me is connectivity.
The world is still very much a disconnected world in that you still have to pay for internet in many airports and hotels and most cities (if not countries) lack large scale wi-fi. If this situation changes I think VDI will become mainstream very quickly!
|
|
|
Jon Wallace on Saturday, September 12, 2009
|
|
|
Just an FYI -
Martin Ingram from AppSense wrote a blog posting on their community site which references this article - http://appsense.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/windows-7-roll-out-will-drive-desktop-virtualization-adoption/
|
|
|
Guest on Sunday, September 13, 2009
|
|
|
Jon,
100% agree with your view.
|
|